This week’s lecture we looked at the scientific method.This is a process of scientific inquiry which involves eight steps:
1) Identifying a problem
2) Asking a question.
3) Making a hypothesis.
4) Designing and conducting an experiment that tests the hypothesis.
5) Data collection.
6) Analysing the results.
7) Drawing a conclusion
8) Devising solutions.
2) Asking a question.
3) Making a hypothesis.
4) Designing and conducting an experiment that tests the hypothesis.
5) Data collection.
6) Analysing the results.
7) Drawing a conclusion
8) Devising solutions.
The scientific method moulds teachers and pupils
perception of scientific enquiry(Braaten et al,2008) and often leads to
scientific enquiry taking place within the class room without pupils having an
understanding of the reasoning behind the scientific enquiry taking place
(Braaten et al,2008). According to Braaten et al (2008) there are four reasons
why the scientific method often fails in class rooms.
The
first cause for its failure is that questions are provided by the teachers as
opposed to the pupils using their imagination to create their own questions:
this can lead to content less science lessons without scientific knowledge or
reasoning, unsuccessfully reflecting scientific ideas.
Secondly is the use of controlled experiments
which do not reflect the experiments which undergo in the professional world of
science. Also the suggestion that a single set of experiments is an ample
amount to base a conclusive finding on is unrealistic.
The third factor which has led to the occasionally
ineffective use of the scientific method within class rooms is that the pupils
lack a platform of knowledge on the given phenomenon on which to base their
questions and hypothesis on.
The final fourth element of the scientific
method is that the pedagogy itself as it doesn’t promote a mind-set which questions
and enquires but rather produces a linear combination of steps which are easy
for a teacher to follow.
Braaten et al (2008) however suggest a different method of teaching
science referred to as model based inquiry which actively involves the pupils
in the process of scientific enquiry and encourages them to practice creativity
through questioning phenomenon for themselves(Braaten,2008). It is a four step process
which involves building a platform of knowledge on a phenomenon, finding the
relationships between phenomenon, deciding the best way to gather results and
questioning results through having discussions with the pupils and considering
their views.
I feel
the model based inquiry approach may be more effective within the class room as
children learn best from being actively involved (Dewey,1910). This approach
offers pupils the opportunity to explore why certain phenomenon happens as opposed
to just how and thus provides them with a deeper understanding as well as developing
a way of thinking with in pupils which is always questioning and exploring.


Braaten,M. Thompson,J. and
Windschitl,M.(2008) Beyond the scientific method: Model-Based Inquiry as a
new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. [online]
available from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=83bcefcd-9814-47e7-96d8-a5176f964789%40sessionmgr110&vid=1&hid=127&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=ehh&AN=34095321
[accessed on 28/2/2014]
Dewey, J. (1910) How
We Think [online] available from https://archive.org/details/howwethink000838mbp
[accessed on 28/2/2014]
No comments:
Post a Comment